I would not like to create for my issue is a separate topic, so I will write here.
How do you think the introduction in France of seventy-five percent tax on luxury(wealth)?
And about the behavior of some of the wealthy people of France!
I won't conceal their position on this issue.
I actually agree with the policy of François Hollande in this direction and I think his position is completely reasonable.
And it's not because I do not belong to the number of millionaires.
With a reasonable point of view, if you have a considerably longer than is necessary for the comfortable life. It is absolutely clear is about honest income. You must understand that you are an indirect perpetrator of the stratification of society. Make imbalance.
Examples of many countries show how dangerous this material imbalance. Especially when the well-off part of the population provides itself is not quite legal ways.
I needn't go far, Russia is.
Where the difference between the incomes of the poorest and richest strata of the population simply monstrous. And the most important stabilizing element, such as the middle class is practically absent.
The able-bodied population loses the motivation to job quality and inevitably degrades.
In these conditions the country turns into a powder keg.
However, Russia has a feature. The country in which production is practically absent. The economy is entirely based on the sale of natural resources.
France fortunately this cannot allow itself and therefore leads without doubt more reasonable social and economic policies.
Develops the production, and in the Wake behind him and the other major sectors. Education science, culture.
And the increase in the tax on luxury is in my opinion an important and correct step. Which at least to some extent reduces the imbalance referred to above.
With regard to some wealthy people.
What would they do not claimed, the flight of the essence of their miserable situation. To flee the country, thinking only îñâîèõ millions of just an unworthy manner.
With people like Bernard Arnault it's perfectly understandable. Greed and nothing more. For the sake of this they live and will live.
But Gerard Depardieu.
Being so famous man in his old age, considered as an insult of fact, when the Prime Minister of France called it a despicable thing his name. However, this is of course only the cause, the cause of it all again greed. Which all the same should not be peculiar to such a man as Gerard.
But especially it sounds funny statement Gerard Depardieu of Russia.
"Russia is a country of great democracy, this is not the country where the Prime Minister, could be called a citizen of their country pathetic person."
This suggests that Gerard absolutely not familiar with the real Russia.
After the fire hegemony around his person, he immediately faced with all the realities of Russian democracy. And he quickly give to understand that he has got one thing right, does not have any rights.
In Russia you are not called pathetic, in Russia you will pathetic
By the way I hope Gerard is not going to keep their millions in Russian banks. As they like to say in the Wild in Russia, never claim that you will not be put in prison and you did not become a beggar! It's not word for word, but the meaning of this.
Although I sincerely respect and wish you good this wonderful actor, but a bit of a miserable man.
Gerard I hope Russia will not be to you too cruel!
And another interesting point is the behavior of Putin.
Do not think that by giving citizenship Gerard Depardieu he wanted to annoy France. Of course not!
Putin wants to show that Russia is supposedly under his rule has become a civilized country, attractive even for people of world values.
It would not be so comrade Putin, we are not deceived. You're a cheater and a country of your wild jungle!
And Gerard soon realize it!
P.S First of all I hope I haven't offended written above! And none of the users of the French is not going to leave France